Legal Opinion

Bank of America, N.A. v. Prissel

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided December 9, 2014No. Nos. 2014AP642, 2014AP647Published

1Opinion of the CourtStark, J.

¶ 1. These consolidated appeals arise from the circuit court's denial of two motions to vacate foreclosure judgments. The borrowers — Todd and Jennifer Prissel, and Elizabeth Gerlach1 — argue the foreclosure judgments should be vacated because the lender —Bank of America, N.A. — failed to publish notices of foreclosure sale within the six-month redemption periods following entry of the judgments. We conclude Wis. Stat. § 846.101(2)2 permitted, but did not require, Bank of America to publish the notices within the six-month redemption periods. We therefore affirm.

BACKGROUND

¶ 2. The underlying…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Karow v. Milwaukee County Civil Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Olson v. FarrarWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State v. Van CampWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Bank Mutual v. S.J. Boyer Construction, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API