Bank of America, N.A. v. Prissel
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtStark, J.
¶ 1. These consolidated appeals arise from the circuit court's denial of two motions to vacate foreclosure judgments. The borrowers — Todd and Jennifer Prissel, and Elizabeth Gerlach1 — argue the foreclosure judgments should be vacated because the lender —Bank of America, N.A. — failed to publish notices of foreclosure sale within the six-month redemption periods following entry of the judgments. We conclude Wis. Stat. § 846.101(2)2 permitted, but did not require, Bank of America to publish the notices within the six-month redemption periods. We therefore affirm.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2. The underlying…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Karow v. Milwaukee County Civil Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Olson v. FarrarWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. Van CampWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
- Bank Mutual v. S.J. Boyer Construction, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.