Legal Opinion

Soltis v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 25, 2025No. 3:18-cv-01780Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SHARON SOLTIS, Plaintiff, v. 3:18-CV-01780 : (JUDGE MARIANI) CVS PHARMACY, INC and JOSEPH LECH Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Presently before the Court are two motions. In the first motion, pro se Plaintiff Sharon Soltis (“Plaintiff or “Soltis”) moves to reopen/reinstate this case. (Doc. 47). In the second motion, Defendants CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and Joseph Lech (together, “Defendants” or “CVS”) move to enforce a purported settlement agreement allegedly entered into by the parties. (Doc. 58). For the reasons that…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. American Eagle Outfitters v. Lyle & Scott Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  3. Budget Blinds, Inc. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  4. Lackner v. GlosserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Meyer, Darragh, Buckler, Bebenek & Eck, P.L.L.C. v. Law Firm of Malone Middleman, P.C.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API