Corbin v. Goepper
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Hutcheson, Justice.
1. The direction of a plaintiff’s counsel, by letter to the clerk of the court, in which the cause is pending, authorizing the clerk to dismiss the case upon the happening of a certain contingency, or upon a certain condition, is binding upon the plaintiff, though he did not know of such dismissal, and consequently did not authorize it; provided the dismissal is not such that it amounts to a retraxit. Especially is this true where it is acted upon by the defendants. Code, § 9-605; Stone Mountain Confederate Monumental Asso. v. Smith, 170 Ga. 515 (153 S. E. 209); Lovelace v.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Haldeman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Rio Grande Irrigation & Colonization Co. v. GildersleeveSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Lovelace v. LovelaceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- Tripp v. Santa Rosa Street RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Beliveau v. Amoskeag Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1894
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- McCullough v. MolyneauxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Wilson v. N. E. Isaacson of Georgia, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1976