Legal Opinion

Brost v. Juul

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 17, 1932No. Gen. No. 35,574PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Gridley

delivered the opinion of the court.

In August, 1929, Anna V. Brost filed a bill to foreclose a second trust deed (hereinafter called the Brost mortgage) on certain improved premises in Chicago. On November 13, 1929, Albert F. Hammann filed a cross-bill to foreclose another trust deed on the same premises (hereinafter called the Hammann mortgage) which he claimed was a prior lien to the Brost mortgage. The cause was referred to a master in chancery who, after hearing the evidence, submitted his report, dated November 24, 1930, in which after making numerous findings…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Home Savings Bank v. BierstadtIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  2. McNew's Executors v. RogersTennessee Supreme Court · 1848
  3. Oppenheimer v. SzulereckiIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Elting v. First National Bank of BiggsvilleIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Tyrrell v. WardIllinois Supreme Court · 1881

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. BryantAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  2. Kaminskas v. CepauskisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API