Brost v. Juul
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Presiding Justice Gridley
delivered the opinion of the court.
In August, 1929, Anna V. Brost filed a bill to foreclose a second trust deed (hereinafter called the Brost mortgage) on certain improved premises in Chicago. On November 13, 1929, Albert F. Hammann filed a cross-bill to foreclose another trust deed on the same premises (hereinafter called the Hammann mortgage) which he claimed was a prior lien to the Brost mortgage. The cause was referred to a master in chancery who, after hearing the evidence, submitted his report, dated November 24, 1930, in which after making numerous findings…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Home Savings Bank v. BierstadtIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
- McNew's Executors v. RogersTennessee Supreme Court · 1848
- Oppenheimer v. SzulereckiIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
- Elting v. First National Bank of BiggsvilleIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- Tyrrell v. WardIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. BryantAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
- Kaminskas v. CepauskisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1938