Legal Opinion

Hand v. Kemp

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 13, 1922No. 7 Div. 122PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.

Under the conditions shown by the record, the plaintiff, as transferee of a nonnegotiable note secured by mortgage, was entitled to foreclose the mortgage so soon as it was in default, and his note was entitled to priority of payment as against the other notes retained by the mortgagee. Knight v. Ray, 75 Ala. 383; Brewer v. Atkeison, 121 Ala. 410, 25 South. 992, 77 Am. St. Rep. 64.

But, since the note was nonnegotiable, being for the payment of cotton only, the maker—the mortgagor—was entitled to notice of its transfer; and if, without such notice, he paid the note and discharged his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ogle v. TurpinIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Vann v. MarburySupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  3. Knight v. RaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  4. Brewer v. AtkeisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Federal Land Bank v. BranscombSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  2. Fed. Land Bank of New Orleans v. Corinth Bank TrustSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  3. Pratt City Sav. Bank v. Merchants' Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  4. Collins v. FormanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  5. Title Guarantee & Trust Co. v. Mortgage CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API