Legal Opinion
Remington Products, Inc. v. North American Philips, Corp.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided January 7, 1991No. Civ. A. B 82-56 (RCZ)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ZAMPANO, Senior District Judge.
Background
On February 3, 1989, this Court issued a ruling granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment on the issue of antitrust injury. Remington Products, Inc. v. North American Philips Corp., 717 F.Supp. 36, 36-48 (D.Conn.1989) (“Remington 7”). Subsequently, plaintiff moved for reconsideration in light of R.C. Bigelow, Inc. v. Unilever, N.V., 867 F.2d 102 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, Thomas J. Lipton, Inc. v. R.C. Bigelow, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 64, 107 L.Ed.2d 31 (1989). Upon reconsideration, the Court denied defendants’ motion on July 10,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. Philadelphia National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. USA Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Cargill, Inc. v. Monfort of Colorado, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Remington Products, Inc. v. North American Philips, Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1991
- In Re StanleyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1995
- O.K. Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. Martin Marietta Corp.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1992
- Casey v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2001
- Bar Technologies, Inc. v. Conemaugh & Black Lick RR Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.