Legal Opinion

Casey v. United States

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided April 9, 2001No. CIV. 3:95CV1949(HBF)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

FITZSIMMONS, United States Magistrate Judge.

On September 13, 1995, plaintiff filed this action under the Federal Torts Claim Act (“FTCA”), alleging medical malpractice and negligence on the part of Veterans Administration (“VA”) employees. On September 30, 1999, this court granted defendant’s oral motion for judgment as a matter of law with respect to plaintiffs allegations that staff at the Newington Veterans Affairs facility was negligent in failing to provide him with Standard Form 95 (“SF 95”) which was a prerequisite to bringing a medical…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Agostini v. FeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Messenger v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. Stanislav Iavorski v. United States Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Harris v. Key Bank National Ass'nDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2002
  2. Colony Grill Development, LLC v. Colony Grill, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2023
  3. Gabbidon v. WilsonDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2021
  4. Liu v. TangneyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2021
  5. S.R. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API