Legal Opinion

Bayer v. Sarot

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 25, 1976PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLynch, J.

The defendant Surgitol appeals from a denial of its motion to dismiss the complaint and cross claim for untimely service of process and lack of jurisdictic i.

The appeal invokes our consideration of a Pennsylvania law (Purdon’s Pa. Stat. Ann., § 2111, subd A), as amended in 1968: "The dissolution of a business corporation, either by the filing of articles of dissolution in the Department of State, or by the decree of a court of common pleas, when the court has not liquidated the assets and property of the corporation, or by expiration of its period of duration, shall not take away or impair…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Victorson v. Bock Laundry Machine Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Seider v. RothNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
  3. Canada Southern Railway Co. v. GebhardSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  4. Relfe v. RundleSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  5. Simpson v. LoehmannNew York Court of Appeals · 1967

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gonzalez v. Progressive Tool & Die Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1978
  2. Ospina v. Vimm Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Lottman v. Piper Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 1989
  4. Mock v. Spivey Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  5. Bayer v. SarotNew York Court of Appeals · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API