Legal Opinion
Crow v. St. Tammany Parish Government
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided December 22, 2016No. 2016 CA 0200PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcClendon, J.
lain this workers’ compensation case, the employer appeals from a judgment that awarded the claimant penalties and attorney fees. The claimant answered the appeal, seeking additional attorney fees for defending the appeal. For the following reasons, we reverse that part of the judgment that awarded penalties and attorney fees and deny the answer to the appeal.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The claimant, Gregory Crow, was employed by St. Tammany Parish Government (STPG) as a budding inspector on September 21, 2004, when he injured his back during the course of his employment. Mr. Crow tried to…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Nee v. N. O. Public Service, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
- Security Credit Corp. v. Menefee Motor Co., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
- Buxton v. Iowa Police DepartmentSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2009
- Red Stick Studio Development, L.L.C. v. State Ex Rel. Department of Economic DevelopmentSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2011
- Iberia Medical Center v. WardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- SR v. St. Tammany Parish Hosp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
- SR v. St. Tammany Parish Hosp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2018