Legal Opinion

Richman v. Dist. Ct. (Haines & Krieger, LLC)

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 2013No. 60676Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

Realty. Haines and Krieger requested that Fenn and Howard obtain advice on behalf of all the named defendants in the Merit complaint. On December 17, 2010, Fenn and Howard met with Adam Levine of the Law Office of Daniel Marks to discuss the demand letter and Merit complaint. The parties dispute many of the facts surrounding this consultation. The real parties in interest allege that Fenn and Howard provided Levine with confidential and in-depth details regarding facets of H&K Realty. The petitioners allege that Fenn and Howard never indicated they were seeking advice on the behalf of Haines…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ogawa v. OgawaNevada Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Matter of King Resources Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1982
  3. Nevada Yellow Cab Corp. v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Ryan's Express Transportation Services, Inc. v. Amador Stage Lines, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Cronin v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API