Calbow v. Midwest Security Insurance
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, J.
Albert Calbow appeals from a summary judgment enforcing the reducing clause in Midwest Security Insurance Company's uninsured motorist policy in favor of Midwest Security. Even though we agree that the purpose of the uninsured motorist coverage is to place the insured in the same position as if the uninsured motorist had been insured, we conclude that an insured who has been fully compensated for injuries from other sources is not entitled to an additional recovery — a windfall — under his or her uninsured motorist benefits. We therefore affirm.
In November 1991, Calbow was injured when…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pierringer v. HogerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Smith v. Atlantic Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
- Nicholson v. Home Insurance Companies, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- Matthiesen v. Continental Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
- Fritsche v. Ford Motor Credit Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cohn v. Town of RandallCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. BaileyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
- Roehl v. American Family Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998
- Estate of Dorschner Ex Rel. Dorschner v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
- Estate of Jones ex rel. Demet v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.