Legal Opinion

In Re Boyle

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 17, 1943PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The only question argued on this appeal is whether rents in the hands of the administrator with the will annexed of Caroline H. Boyle, deceased, are available for the payment of decedent's debts. The rents have been collected by the administrator under the authority of R.S. 3:17-8. The lands of which the rents are the income, were devised by Miss Boyle as part of her residuary estate, to nieces and nephews. Two provisions of her will should be mentioned. One is a direction "that all my just debts and funeral expenses be duly paid as soon as conveniently can be after my death." The other is a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bowes v. United StatesNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1940
  2. Joselson v. JoselsonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
  3. Paletz v. Camden Safe Deposit, C., Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1931
  4. Freeth v. RuleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  5. McKinley v. CoeNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1904

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. BrittenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
  2. Bankers Trust Company v. HessNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
  3. McTamney v. McTamneyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1946
  4. In Re YoungNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API