Legal Opinion

Udall v. Townsend

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided October 1, 1998No. 19243PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ALARID, J.

{1} Gary Townsend (Father) appeals an order on his motion to reduce child support. After one assignment to the summary calendar, the appeal was assigned to the general calendar for full briefing. Because no brief-in-chief was timely filed, this Court issued an order to show cause in writing why the appeal should not be dismissed for failure to file a brief-in-chief. Father’s response is unpersuasive. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

{2} Father argues that this Court has before it sufficient argument, authority, and facts in order to reverse this case on the summary calendar.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. IbarraNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. State v. GonzalesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Newsome v. FarerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. CalancheNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Olguin v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Holt v. New Mexico Department of Taxation & RevenueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Bordnick v. HoyleNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Christoffel v. CloudNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. El Castillo Retirement Residences v. MartinezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. El Castillo Retirement Residences v. MartinezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2019

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API