Marshall v. Colburn
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*153Steinle, J.
The questions presented on this appeal are: (a) Under the evidence was Colburn excluded from coverage as an additional insured in the Nordrum policy as a matter of law ? (b) Under the evidence was the Marshall automobile jointly owned by the husband and wife as a matter of law? and (c) Under the evidence was Colburn free from causal negligence as to lookout as a matter of law? Question (a) involves consideration of whether the provision in the liability insurance policy issued to Nordrum with respect to exclusion from coverage therein of persons operating a public garage, service…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Klas v. FenskeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1946
- Parkes v. LindenmannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
- Drakenberg v. KnightWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
3Cited by3 opinions
- Meyer v. Mutual Service Casualty InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Ivy v. Tower InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Marshall v. ColburnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957