Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Colburn

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1957PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*153Steinle, J.

The questions presented on this appeal are: (a) Under the evidence was Colburn excluded from coverage as an additional insured in the Nordrum policy as a matter of law ? (b) Under the evidence was the Marshall automobile jointly owned by the husband and wife as a matter of law? and (c) Under the evidence was Colburn free from causal negligence as to lookout as a matter of law? Question (a) involves consideration of whether the provision in the liability insurance policy issued to Nordrum with respect to exclusion from coverage therein of persons operating a public garage, service…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Klas v. FenskeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Parkes v. LindenmannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Drakenberg v. KnightWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Meyer v. Mutual Service Casualty InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Ivy v. Tower InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Marshall v. ColburnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API