Legal Opinion

Ivy v. Tower Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1966PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGordon, J.

The plaintiff offers three principal arguments to convince this court to set aside the verdict of the jury which was upheld by the trial court. Our review of the record requires that we reject each of these contentions and affirm the judgment. This opinion will examine each of the appellant’s contentions.

Nonnegligence as a Matter of Law.

The main thrust of this appeal is Mr. Ivy’s claim that he was not negligent as a matter of law. In support of this argument, Mr. Ivy points to the uncontradicted fact that the broken concrete flew suddenly under his foot from the wheels of the backhoe tractor.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matsumato v. Arizona Sand and Rock CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Crossman v. GippWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Marshall v. ColburnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Schiermeier v. HoeffkenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1941

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kalkopf v. Donald Sales & Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. McCrossen v. Nekoosa Edwards Paper Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API