Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commonwealth v. Meehan

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 13, 1962No. Appeals, Nos. 161 and 162Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Flood, J.:

The appellant was convicted of robbery. The victim, Mr. Harry Lucet, was the only eyewitness. At the first trial, held before Judge Blanc commencing May 29, 1961, the appellant, Meehan, was represented by a member of the staff of the Defender Association of Philadelphia. A co-defendant, McKnight, was represented by private counsel. The jury found both defend*568ants guilty, but Judge Blanc granted a new trial. McKnight’s private counsel withdrew from the case and another member of the staff of the Defender Association, who had not participated in the first trial,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Whitling v. RussellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Commonwealth ex rel. Whitling v. RussellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API