Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Martinez

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided August 21, 1979No. 3630Published

1Dissent

SUTIN, Judge (dissenting).

I dissent.

Defendant, Linda Martinez, was convicted of fraud in the sale of real property to John and Kathrine Crosby in violation of § 30-16-6, N.M.S.A. 1978. It reads in pertinent part:

Fraud consists of the intentional misappropriation or taking of anything of value which belongs to another by means of fraudulent conduct, practices or representations.

Whoever commits fraud when the value of the thing misappropriated or taken exceeds twenty-five hundred dollars ($2,500) is guilty of a third degree felony.

The essential elements of this crime are (1) that defendant…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. MillsArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  2. State v. AurgemmaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1976
  3. Tumminello v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  4. People v. RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. State v. ForsheeUtah Supreme Court · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API