Legal Opinion

E. Dillingham, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided May 20, 1991No. Court No. 88-01-00056Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

Restani, Judge:

This case involves classification for tariff purposes of various kinds of writing and printing paper imported from Canada between 1984 and 1987. United States Customs (“Customs”) classified the class of papers known as printing papers as coated printing paper under item 254.46, Tariff Schedules of the United States (“TSUS”) and assessed a duty at either 4%, 3.5%, 3%, or 2.5% ad valorem, depending upon the date of entry. Customs classified the writing grades of paper as coated writing paper under TSUS item 254.56 and assessed a duty at either 4.9%, 4.7%, or 4.4% ad…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brookside Veneers, Ltd. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  2. Digital Equipment Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  3. The West Bend Company, Division of Dart Industries, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
  4. Freedman & Slater, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API