Legal Opinion

United States v. Cathcard

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided April 24, 1946No. Civ. 59PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONOHOE, District Judge.

This is an action by the United States against James S. Cathcard, incompetent, and Helen L. Marsh, his guardian, to recover from the defendants the sum of $7,-964.11, with interest and costs, on the ground that the defendants are indebted to the United States in that amount.

It is alleged in the complaint that this sum represents a balance due to the United States from the defendants on account of payments of compensation and vocational training pay, which were made to the incompetent, a veteran of World War I, under the provisions of legislation enacted for the benefit…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Sunshine Anthracite Coal Co. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Tait v. Western Maryland Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Taylor v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1953
  2. United States v. DaubendiekDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1959
  3. Griffin v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1953
  4. Torti v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
  5. Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe of Indians v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API