Legal Opinion

Kolodzcak v. Peerless Motor Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1931No. Docket No. 8, Calendar No. 35,491PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

On July 29, 1925, plaintiff purchased of defendant an automobile. Shortly thereafter he had an accident with it. He testified: “Ten days after I purchased the automobile I smashed it.” Plaintiff claims that, aside from the damage resulting from the accident, the machine was defective. Within the two and a half months following the purchase plaintiff frequently placed the automobile in defendant’s garage for repairs, and he claims he was assured that by repairing defendant could and would place the machine in good running condition. This result was not accomplished. On or about October 20,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Burkett v. Oil Automatic Heating Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Hoyt v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Walker v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wade v. Chariot Trailer Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Mattson v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. Baios v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Ross v. FaberWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API