Legal Opinion
United States v. Napadow
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided February 23, 2010No. 09-1920PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.
On April 17, 2008, a federal grand jury returned a six-count indictment charging Michael Napadow with knowingly devising a scheme to defraud and obtain money from home inspectors by selling fraudulent insurance. The indictment contained two counts of wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343 (Counts One and Three), and four counts of mail fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (Counts Two, Four, Five and Six). The district court denied his motion to dismiss the indictment for lack of a speedy trial. Mr. Napadow now seeks review of that decision. Because we conclude…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Henderson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Zedner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- United States v. RollinsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Michael Gerald GamboaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. GordonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. HillsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- United States v. O'ConnorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- United States v. WassonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- United States v. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.