Legal Opinion
Pamela K. Lane v. J.C. Penney Life Insurance Company, a Vermont Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 7, 1995No. 93-36099PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
60 F.3d 833
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Pamela K. LANE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
J.C. PENNEY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Vermont corporation,
Defendant-Appellee.
No. 93-36099.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted June 5, 1995.
Decided July 7, 1995.
1
Before CANBY and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges, and LEGGE,* District Judge.
2
MEMORANDUM**
3
The parties…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Jeanette Jesinger v. Nevada Federal Credit Union, a Federally-Chartered Credit Union Robert W. FleischmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Weil & Associates v. Urban Renewal AgencySupreme Court of Kansas · 1971
3Cited by2 opinions
- Holloway v. J.C. Penney Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
- Holloway v. J.C. Penney Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999