Beazer v. New York City Health
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Catterson and Acosta, JJ.,
dissent in a memorandum by Catterson, J., as follows: Because I believe that there is no material issue of fact on the issue of bailment, I respectfully dissent and would grant summary judgment to defendant Beys.
A brief review of the law of bailments is necessary to a resolution of this case because the majority has not set forth any principles of bailments that would control the outcome of this dispute. “As this Court stated in Martin v Briggs (235 AD2d 192, 197): ‘A “[b]ailment does not necessarily and always, though generally, depend upon a contractual relation.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Sukljian v. Charles Ross & Son Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Foulke v. New York Consolidated RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Phelps v. . PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Winckel v. Atlantic Rentals & Sales, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Martin v. BriggsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.