Legal Opinion · Dissent

Beazer v. New York City Health

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 3, 2010Published

1Dissent

Catterson and Acosta, JJ.,

dissent in a memorandum by Catterson, J., as follows: Because I believe that there is no material issue of fact on the issue of bailment, I respectfully dissent and would grant summary judgment to defendant Beys.

A brief review of the law of bailments is necessary to a resolution of this case because the majority has not set forth any principles of bailments that would control the outcome of this dispute. “As this Court stated in Martin v Briggs (235 AD2d 192, 197): ‘A “[b]ailment does not necessarily and always, though generally, depend upon a contractual relation.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Sukljian v. Charles Ross & Son Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Foulke v. New York Consolidated RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  3. Phelps v. . PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  4. Winckel v. Atlantic Rentals & Sales, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  5. Martin v. BriggsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API