Legal Opinion

United States v. Hardwick

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 3, 2008No. 06-2541, 06-2571, 06-3061, and 06-5051PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GARTH, Circuit Judge:

The four defendants in this case filed separate appeals that were consolidated upon motion by the Government. Although the defendants raise numerous arguments on appeal, only two questions warrant discussion. 1 We address whether a waiver in a proffer agreement that allows the Government to use a defendant’s proffer statements 2 as part of its case-in-chief at trial is valid and enforceable. We also consider whether admission of that proffer statement violated the Confrontation Clause rights of other defendants who were implicated in that proffer statement. As…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Pabon v. MahanoyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  2. Thomas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. United States v. RosemondCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
  4. Samia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2023
  5. Browne v. PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2012

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API