Legal Opinion
McGovern v. George Washington University
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 28, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2014-0215PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BERYL A. HOWELL, Chief Judge
The plaintiff, Raymond McGovern, claims violations of his constitutional rights by the defendants, George Washington University (“GW”), and three individuals employed by GW as Special Police Officers (“SPOs”), Christopher Brown, Michael Glaubach, and Jamie Barton, arising from the plaintiffs arrest after he “engaged in a silent expression of dissent” during an address by then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on GW’s property. See Compl. at 1-2; ¶¶ 1-2, 28, ECF No. 1. The defendants have moved for summary judgment, see Defs.’ Mot. Summ. J.…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Sacchetti v. Gallaudet Univ.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Raymond McGovern v. Christopher BrownCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Slovinec v. Georgetown UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Capitol Hill Baptist Church v. BowserDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- Glosser & Malimon v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2024
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.