Legal Opinion
Caldwell v. Jenkins
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
Decided June 23, 1993No. CA 92-1304PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
John E. Jennings, Chief Judge.
The appellees, Roger and Patricia Jenkins, filed suit in Phillips County Circuit Court against Jim Caldwell, the appellant, seeking damages based on Caldwell’s sale of a car to them, allegedly with knowledge that the odometer had been turned back. The complaint set out two theories of recovery: common law fraud (with a claim for punitive damages) and violation of Ark. Code. Ann. § 4-90-204 (Repl. 1991), which prohibits the sale of a motor vehicle with knowledge that the mileage registered on the odometer has been altered. The jury returned a verdict in favor of…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. RummellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
- Currier v. SpencerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
- New Hampshire Insurance v. QuilantanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- Boren v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
- Federal Life Insurance v. HaseSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1995
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1995
- Simpson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003