Legal Opinion

State v. Usher

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 21, 1995No. 93C20629; CA A83799Published

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

Defendant appeals convictions for unlawful delivery of a controlled substance and unlawful possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992. He assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence obtained pursuant to a search of his residence. Defendant asserts that the affidavits in support of the warrant to search his residence were insufficient to establish probable cause. He asserts several other assignments of error, as well. We write only to address the sufficiency of the affidavits in support of the warrant and affirm.

When the sufficiency of an affidavit is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. AnspachOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. KittredgeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  3. State v. ScheerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  4. State v. MaxfieldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  5. State v. MaxfieldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API