State v. Maxfield
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.
Defendant appeals her convictions for manufacture and possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992. On appeal, she argues that the trial court erred in denying her motion to suppress evidence that was seized from her residence pursuant to a search warrant. Defendant argues that the affidavit in support of the warrant was insufficient to establish probable cause to believe that seizable evidence would be found at her residence. We agree with defendant and reverse.
At issue is the sufficiency of the affidavit of Josephine County narcotics detective Claar, who said in his affidavit that he…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. VillagranOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. AnspachOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. Carter/GrantOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. ChamblessCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. MaxfieldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- State v. MunroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- State v. MaxfieldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- State v. MunroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- State v. UsherCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.