Legal Opinion
Clark v. Industrial Accident Commission
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 9, 1933No. Docket No. 4845PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPullen, P. J.
The petitioner asks this court to review that portion of the findings and award entered by the In dustrial Accident Commission in a proceeding which holds specifically that defendant employer was not covered by the terms of a compensation insurance policy issued to him by the State Compensation Insurance Fund.
The admitted facts are that Clark Brothers were the owners of a grain harvester which they used not only to harvest their own crops but also the crops of their neighbors. Among others they harvested the crops of Howard Clark. Howard Clark had no interest in the harvester, but by…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Everett v. Standard Accident InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Hanson v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Welch v. British American Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1905
- Maryland C. Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1918
- O'Brien v. O'BrienCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cal-Farm Insurance v. BoisserancCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Clarkson v. MFA Mutual Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
- Leroux v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. StewartAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987