Legal Opinion

Fraser v. Freedman

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 20, 1925No. Appeals 293 and 294PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Porter, J.,

This is an action for personal injuries to Robert ' T. Fraser, who at the time of the accident wias over fourteen years of age. The boy and his father recovered verdicts in the court below but the court entered judgment in favor of the defendant non obstante veredicto, upon the ground that the boy was guilty of contributory negligence. The plaintiffs have taken these appeals land here assign for error that ruling of the court. We have, therefore, only to consider wheth er the evidence produced by the plaintiffs was such as to require the submission of the case to the jury.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Keith v. Worcester & Blackstone Valley Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  2. Flynn v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  3. Krenn v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  4. Karl v. Juniata CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cook v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. Smith v. SnellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  3. Smith v. SnellerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Cook v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API