Fraser v. Freedman
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Porter, J.,
This is an action for personal injuries to Robert ' T. Fraser, who at the time of the accident wias over fourteen years of age. The boy and his father recovered verdicts in the court below but the court entered judgment in favor of the defendant non obstante veredicto, upon the ground that the boy was guilty of contributory negligence. The plaintiffs have taken these appeals land here assign for error that ruling of the court. We have, therefore, only to consider wheth er the evidence produced by the plaintiffs was such as to require the submission of the case to the jury.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Keith v. Worcester & Blackstone Valley Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Flynn v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
- Krenn v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- Karl v. Juniata CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cook v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Smith v. SnellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Smith v. SnellerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Cook v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955