Legal Opinion

Smith v. Sneller

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 12, 1942No. Appeal, 271PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Drew,

This is an action in trespass in which plaintiff recovered a verdict and judgment. On appeal, the Superior Court reversed the judgment on the ground that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence, and entered judgment n. o. v. for defendant Sneller, he alone having appealed. This appeal was then specially allowed.

The opinion of the learned Superior Court, written by Judge IIirt, reported at 147 Pa. Superior Ct. 231, accurately states the facts as follows: “Plaintiff, while engaged in a house to house canvass as a salesman of small articles, was injured in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Keith v. Worcester & Blackstone Valley Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  2. Flynn v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  3. Krenn v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  4. Karl v. Juniata CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  5. Fraser v. FreedmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Poyner v. LoftusDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Cook v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. Davis v. FeinsteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  4. Clawson v. Walgreen Drug Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Coker v. McDonald's Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API