Ex Parte First Nat. Bank of Ozark
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.
Prior to the adoption in this state of the Uniform Negotiable Instruments Law (Code 1907, §§ 4958-5149; Code 1923, §§ 9029-9222), this court had always recognized the distinctions impressed by the common law and the Statute of Anne on instruments given under seal, and, though a promise to pay money were in the exact form of a negotiable promissory note, it was held that its execution under the seal of the maker destroyed, its character in law as a promissory note, and made of it an obligation legally different and distinct, a specialty, usually called a bill single or writing obligatory,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Litchfield v. FalconerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1841
- Reed v. ScottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1857
- Long v. GwinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
- Phillips v. Americus Guano Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1895
- St. Paul's Episcopal Church v. FieldsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1909
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of Montgomery v. Town of LuverneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- Foster v. HACIENDA NIRVANA, INC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2009
- Commercial Service Corp. v. StrattonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
- Hall v. Estes Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1932