Legal Opinion

Ex Parte First Nat. Bank of Ozark

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 9, 1924No. 4 Div. 160PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.

Prior to the adoption in this state of the Uniform Negotiable Instruments Law (Code 1907, §§ 4958-5149; Code 1923, §§ 9029-9222), this court had always recognized the distinctions impressed by the common law and the Statute of Anne on instruments given under seal, and, though a promise to pay money were in the exact form of a negotiable promissory note, it was held that its execution under the seal of the maker destroyed, its character in law as a promissory note, and made of it an obligation legally different and distinct, a specialty, usually called a bill single or writing obligatory,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Litchfield v. FalconerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1841
  2. Reed v. ScottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1857
  3. Long v. GwinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  4. Phillips v. Americus Guano Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  5. St. Paul's Episcopal Church v. FieldsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Montgomery v. Town of LuverneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  2. Foster v. HACIENDA NIRVANA, INC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  3. Commercial Service Corp. v. StrattonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Hall v. Estes Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API