Legal Opinion

Paul v. Staten Island Edison Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 18, 1956PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeldock, J.

This is an action to recover damages for the alleged wrongful death of plaintiff’s intestate and for his conscious pain and suffering. The intestate, a lineman employed by Utility Lines Construction Co., Inc., was a member of a crew engaged in the removal of electric wires from an old defective wooden pole and the transfer of these wires to a new pole. While thus engaged upon the old pole the intestate was electrocuted when, at a point 20 feet above the ground, the pole suddenly broke, causing him to be thrown against high tension electric wires. The poles were owned jointly by the defendants…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Marks v. Nambil Realty Co., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
  3. Runkel v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
  4. Kowalsky v. Conreco CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  5. Caspersen v. La Sala Bros.New York Court of Appeals · 1930

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jones v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  2. In Re Franklin Nat. Bank Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1978
  3. Wolf v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Schwartz v. Greenfield, Stein & WeisingerNew York Supreme Court · 1977
  5. In Re Franklin National Bank Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API