Legal Opinion

Duty v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 1976No. 1-1175A204PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLybrook, J.

Defendant-appellant Duty, brings this appeal from his conviction in the Hendricks Superior Court, for the offense of escape from lawful detention. Duty contests the propriety of the procedure in the Hendricks Circuit Court, sitting as a juvenile court, waiving juvenile jurisdiction over him and ordering him to stand trial as an adult. We reverse for the reason that the juvenile court failed to obtain original jurisdicton over Duty.

Our appellate courts have repeatedly outlined the procedural steps which must be taken by the juvenile court to properly obtain jurisdiction. Hicks v. State (1967),…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Summers v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Seay v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Shupe v. BELLIndiana Court of Appeals · 1957
  4. Hicks v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Ingram v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Tacy v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Taylor v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
  3. K.S. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Matter of TacyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Redding v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API