Legal Opinion
Robins Maintenance, Inc. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 20, 2001No. 01-5010PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DYK, Circuit Judge.
This case involves a claim by Robins Maintenance, Inc. (“RMI”) for an equitable adjustment to a grounds maintenance contract with the Robins Air Force Base (“Robins AFB”) based on a theory of defective specifications. We conclude that the Court of Federal Claims properly granted the government’s motion for summary judgment because RMI’s knowledge of the errors in the specifications precluded recovery, and RMI abandoned all other claims not based on the defective specifications.
BACKGROUND
On April 30, 1992, the United States Air Force (“Air Force”) issued a request for…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. SpearinSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Metric Constructors, Inc. v. National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Ragonese & Scaravelli v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Nvt Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- E.L. Hamm & Associates, Inc. v. Gordon R. England, Secretary of NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Comtrol, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Turner Construction Co., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Conner Brothers Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.