State v. Ross
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
[Cite as State v. Ross, 128 Ohio St.3d 283,
2010-Ohio-6282.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. ROSS, APPELLEE. [Cite as State v. Ross, 128 Ohio St.3d 283,
2010-Ohio-6282.] Criminal procedure — Crim.R. 29(C) — Crim.R. 29 and 45(B) do not permit a defendant to file a motion to renew an already denied motion for acquittal outside the Crim.R. 29(C) time frame — Cause remanded. (No. 2009-1619 Submitted September 15, 2010 Decided December 28, 2010.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Summit County, No. 21906, 184 Ohio App.3d 174,
2009-Ohio-3561. __________________ CUPP, J. {¶ 1} This appeal…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Kontrick v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.