Legal Opinion
Leibowitz v. CITY OF MINEOLA, TEX.
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided October 2, 2009No. Civil Action 6:08CV397PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
JUDITH K. GUTHRIE, United States Magistrate Judge.
The above-styled lawsuit was filed on October 9, 2008. The matter was transferred to the undersigned with the consent of the parties. Defendant filed a Motion for Summary Judgment (document # 31). The Court conducted a hearing on the motion for summary judgment on September 25, 2009. Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, and counsel for Defendants presented arguments at the hearing. For the reasons assigned below, the undersigned finds that the Motion for Summary Judgment should be granted.
Background
In his Amended…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Monumental Task Committee, Inc. v. FoxxDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2016
- Greater Houston German Shepherd Dog Rescue, Inc. v. Lydia Lira and Alfonso Lira, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014
- Holt's Cigar Co. v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Holt's Cigar Co. v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Tina Patterson and Larry Patterson v. City of Bellmead, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2013