United States v. Maharajh
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Concurrence
Senior Judge LEWIS
(concurring):
“On the other hand, it is the duty and responsibility of a court-martial to adjudge a punitive discharge if the members conclude, based upon the evidence before them, that further service is not warranted.” No. Congress intended that a punitive discharge be severe punishment and that it be treated as severe punishment by those who impose it. United States v. Soriano, 20 M.J. 337, 342 (C.M.A.1985), and cases cited therein. It would take a whole lot of proper sentencing instructions —a good deal more than what we have before us in this case, in my view — to remove…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. SorianoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
- United States v. OhrtU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1988
- United States v. WeikelU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1987