Legal Opinion
Packgen v. Berry Plastics Corp.
District Court, D. Maine
Decided September 12, 2014No. 2:12-cv-00080-JAWPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTION TO EXCLUDE EXPERT TESTIMONY
JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR., Chief Judge.
In anticipation of trial, Berry Plastics Corporation and Covalence Specialty Coatings, LLC move to exclude the expert testimony of Packgen’s damages expert on multiple grounds, including lack of qualifications, improper methodology, and lack of facts or data supporting his opinions. The Court denies the motion because Packgen has demonstrated that each of the arguments for exclusion go to the weight of the expert’s testimony and should be tested by the adversary process.
I. STATEMENT OF FACTS
A. Procedural History
Packg…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Lifewise Master Funding v. TelebankCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Ruiz-Troche v. Pepsi Cola of Puerto Rico Bottling Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Baillargeon v. CSX TransportationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2022
- Noel Reyes-Muñoz, et al. v. Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2026
- OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS v. CALPERS CORPORATE PARTNERS LLCDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2020