State v. Dinh Loc Ta
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Luckert, J.:
This appeal raises the issue of whether the State presented sufficient evidence of a lewd fondling or touching by proving that Dinh Loe Ta touched the faces, hair, arms, and legs of two young girls, touches the trial judge referred to as “relatively innocuous.” Because the touches did not tend to undermine the children’s morals and were not so clearly offensive as to outrage the moral senses of a reasonable person, we conclude the evidence against Ta was insufficient, and we reverse his convictions on two counts of aggravated indecent…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. ShabaniSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- State v. WardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
- United States v. ApfelbaumSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. SpragueSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
- State v. ReedSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
- People v. GravesSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016
- State v. OrtegaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.