Legal Opinion

State v. Dinh Loc Ta

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 28, 2012No. 104,241PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Luckert, J.:

This appeal raises the issue of whether the State presented sufficient evidence of a lewd fondling or touching by proving that Dinh Loe Ta touched the faces, hair, arms, and legs of two young girls, touches the trial judge referred to as “relatively innocuous.” Because the touches did not tend to undermine the children’s morals and were not so clearly offensive as to outrage the moral senses of a reasonable person, we conclude the evidence against Ta was insufficient, and we reverse his convictions on two counts of aggravated indecent…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. ShabaniSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. State v. WardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  4. United States v. ApfelbaumSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. SpragueSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  2. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
  3. State v. ReedSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  4. People v. GravesSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016
  5. State v. OrtegaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API