Cleveland, C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. Weil
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SPARKS, Circuit Judge.
The only issue presented and urged in its appeal is whether the trial court erred in not sustaining appellant’s motion for a directed verdict.
There is substantial evidence supporting the following facts: Appellant’s tracks run through Charleston, Illinois, east and west, and parallel to Railroad Street which is paved and which adjoins the south line of appellant’s yards. The tracks cross Division Street which is also paved and forms the west line of appellant’s yards, practically at right angled. Second, Third and Fourth Streets parallel Division Street and are…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. SlaughterIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
- Tutt v. Illinois Cent. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1900
- Smith v. Pittsburgh & W. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio · 1898
- Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. FlemingIndiana Supreme Court · 1915
- Arizona Copper Co. v. GarciaArizona Supreme Court · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Curtiss v. New York Cent. R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935