Legal Opinion

Curtiss v. New York Cent. R.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 22, 1935No. 418Published

1Opinion of the CourtChase, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above).

The law of Massachusetts is the lex loci delicti which governs the action. Young v. Masci, 289 U. S. 253, 53 S. Ct. 599, 77 L. Ed. 1158, 88 A. L. R. 170; Cuba Railroad Co. v. Crosby, 222 U. S. 473, 32 S. Ct. 132, 56 L. Ed. 274, 38 L. R. A. (N. S.) 40.

The new road over the crossing, not having been opened to the public at the time of the accident, was a private way, so the appellant urges, in using which the plaintiff was but a licensee and entitled only to have the defendant refrain from injuring him in a wanton and willful manner. If he were hut such a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bourne v. WhitmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  2. Cuba Railroad v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Young v. MasciSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Wright v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
  5. Fortune v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API