In Re Ross Family Trusts
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtRudman, J.
[¶ 1] The two minor children of Rodney E. Ross III appeal from the judgment entered in the Cumberland County Probate Court (Childs, J.) holding that the three trust agreements of which they are remainder beneficiaries provide for the distribution of the trust assets in accordance with the intestacy laws of the State of Maine and not, as they contend, per stirpes. The children argue that the express reference to per stirpes in a trust article directing distribution of principal takes precedence over a subsequent article defining per stirpes in conformity with the intestacy laws of Maine in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Stickney v. City of SacoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
- Cassidy v. MurraySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1949
- Willis Realty Associates v. Cimino Construction Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
- Mellen v. MellenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1952
- Boehner v. BriggsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- University of Maine Foundation v. Fleet Bank of MaineSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
- In Re Estate of BarrowsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
- Merrick v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004
- Attorney General v. Pine Tree Council, Inc., Boy Scouts or AmericaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2025