Legal Opinion

Demetrius v. Marsh

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 23, 1983No. Civ. A. 82-0968PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

RAYMOND J. BRODERICK, District Judge.

Defendants separately through their individual attorneys move to dismiss this civil rights action on several grounds. For the reasons set forth herein, the defendants’ motions will be granted only insofar as the plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment claim is concerned; and will be otherwise denied.

Plaintiff, Julius Demetrius, through his attorney has filed this complaint in which he generally asserts a claim under the Civil Rights Act of 1871, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, based on the alleged excessive use of force against him during an arrest by defendants,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Johnson v. GlickCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  3. Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NY v. TomanioSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Charles v. Shillingford v. Van E. Holmes, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  5. Kauffman v. MossCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Eisenberg v. GagnonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Sprague v. City of BurleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
  3. McClelland v. Herlitz, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1989
  4. City of Saint Albans v. BotkinsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2011
  5. City of Saint Albans v. BotkinsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API