Legal Opinion

Gaylor v. McHenry

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1860PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL from the Fayette Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtHanna, J.

This was a suit for partition, brought by the appellant, Mary Ann Ilayden, now Gaylor, against the heirs of Hosea Hayden, her late husband. They appeared and answered, that at the time of his death she was living apart and separate from him, in Rush county, in adultery. Upon this question an issue was formed, and by agreement of parties, submitted to a jury. The verdict was affirmative upon the question so submitted. The judgment was for the defendants,- and stated the fact found by the jury.

It is urged that the Court erred, in receiving and excluding evidence, in giving and refusing…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1837
  2. Wright v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1840
  3. Winemiller v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. LawrenceNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Richey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Spade v. HawkinsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
  4. Goodwin v. OwenIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Estate of Calcutt v. CalcuttIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API