Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1837PublishedCited by 8 opinions

ERROR to the Fayette Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlackford, J.

Indictment against Armstrong. Two counts. One count charges the defendant with keeping a room to be used and occupied for gambling. The other, for renting a *248room to another person to be used and occupied for that purpose< Verdict and judgment for the state.

The statute on the subject of this indictment is, that if any person shall keep a room, &c., to be used and occupied for gambling, or shall rent to another a room for that object, he shall be fined, &c.

The Court charged the jury, “That if it was proved that the defendant’ had, permitted a roulette to be kept and gambled upon at any one time…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. CroteauSupreme Court of Vermont · 1849
  2. Chase v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1875
  3. Gaylor v. McHenryIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
  4. McAlpin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1853
  5. Winemiller v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1859

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API