Legal Opinion
Cremeans v. Taczak
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided August 17, 2022No. 2:19-cv-02703Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION NICOLETTE CREMEANS, et al., : : Plaintiffs, : Case No. 2:19-cv-2703 : v. : Chief Judge Algenon L. Marbley : SAMANTHA TACZAK, et al., : Magistrate Judge Elizabeth P. Deavers : Defendants. : OPINION & ORDER This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ and Defendants’ Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment (ECF Nos. 94 & 110), as well as Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel (ECF No. 112) and Defendants’ Motion to Strike (ECF No. 131). For the reasons that follow, Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED, and…
2Cases cited70 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.