Legal Opinion

Carabetta Builders, Inc. v. Hotz Corp.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided January 26, 1993No. 11163PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFreedman, J.

Carabetta Builders, Inc. (Carabetta), appeals from the trial court’s granting of Hotz Corporation’s (Hotz) application to confirm an arbitration award and from the trial court’s denial of Carabetta’s *158application to vacate, correct or modify the arbitration award. Carabetta presents a plethora of issues to this court, but when these issues are properly scrutinized, they come down to the following: Did the trial court improperly (1) find that the arbitration proceedings were governed by the Connecticut law of arbitration rather than the federal arbitration law and (2) confirm the arbitration…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Garrity v. McCaskeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  3. Barnard v. BarnardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  4. Thompson & Peck, Inc. v. Harbor Marine Contracting Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. White v. KampnerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  2. Hotz Corp. v. CarabettaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  3. Carabetta Builders, Inc. v. Hotz Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API