Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Wolff

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 3, 1948No. Civ. 13599PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

Plaintiffs, Palmer and Cane, appeal from a judgment denying their petition for a writ of mandate to restore them to their civil service positions with the city of San Francisco. Petitioners had been employees of the Market Street Railway Company and were duly blanketed into the civil service of the city under section 125 of the charter when the city acquired the railway on September 29, 1944. Both were replaced after having reached the age of 70, the age of compulsory retirement under section 165(b) of the charter—Palmer on June 19, 1946, by a certified qualified civil service employee, Cane…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Clementine v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Corcoran v. San Francisco City & County Employees Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  2. Los Angeles County Safety Police Ass'n v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  3. Snelling v. Civil Service BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. LA CTY. SAFETY POLICE ASSN. v. County of LACalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API