Legal Opinion

Doane v. Pere Marquette Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1929No. Docket No. 38, Calendar No. 34,326PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

The question here presented is thus stated by counsel for the appellant:

“Is the track and right of way of the defendant company situated outside the corporate limits of a city or village liable to assessment for benefits for construction of a public drain, or is such track and right of way exempt from such taxation?”

Prior to 1909 the drain ’ law provided that the commissioner should include in his assessment for benefits all property through which a proposed drain should run. 2 Comp. Laws 1897, § 4344. This law was amended by Act No. 320, Pub. Acts 1909. Section 1 of chapter 5 provided for…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Detroit Edison Co. v. Department of RevenueMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. StollMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  3. In Re Atherton's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  4. In Re Petition of Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Heller v. Department of RevenueMichigan Supreme Court · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API